SubGuide - An Online Guide to Managing Substitute Teachers
More Tools & Resources
More information for implementing the best tools and best practices to help you
effectively recruit, train and retain professional substitute teachers:
New To Managing Substitute Teachers?
If you are new to substitute teacher management, below you will find a comprehensive guide to the three major aspects
of substitute teacher management:
- Recruiting
- Training
- Retaining
Each section has an overview and links to articles published in the SubJournal: the professional substitute teacher management
journal containing best practices in substitute teacher management written by experts in the field.
Preface
This section is a source to be used by HR personnel when working with issues related to substitute teacher management.
From recruiting and retention, to legal issues and training the SubGuide provides insightful and useful information
(often taken from research) for both novice and experienced SubManagers. You may visit the SubGuide as often as you like.
As you visit, read, and reflect on its contents, the more you will come to discover solutions to issues and concerns related
to establishing a successful substitute teacher management program.
Table of Contents
The initial content of the SubGuide was initiated in 1999 and focused on Best Practices in Managing Substitute Teaching.
Over time, some issues related to "best practices" have become more critical, some have disappeared, while others continue
to act as thorns beneath the skin; proving difficult to resolve. Districts that have been successful in establishing valuable
practices have devoted the necessary time, money, and personnel in a plan of action and have not allowed themselves to be stonewalled.
Although substitute teacher quality was not addressed in the No Child Left Behind legislation, its importance in the
educating children cannot be ignored. Particularly when over one full year of every child's K12 education is taught by substitute
teachers. Valuable classroom time cannot be wasted with instruction that is inadequate or where the instructor is merely
"babysitting." All instructional personnel must demonstrate that they possess the skills and knowledge necessary to warrant
their employment. When improvement is deemed necessary, opportunities to improve skills through training must be made available.
The goals, objectives, content, and expectations for student achievement and learning cannot be compromised because a substitute
is teaching a class. We should never accept the mentality that a substitute teacher is just "holding down the fort."
By carefully studying and implementing the information contained in the SubGuide, districts
can maximize the quantity, quality, and effectiveness of the substitute teachers serving in their districts.
Information on how some school districts have developed programs of substitute teacher management
that address specific concerns can be found in the following articles:
-
Ayling, R. (2003) Substitutes = Q x Q: Maintaining the quality while managing the quantity. SubJournal, 4(2), 8-11.
-
Lamarque, E. (2005) St. Tammany Parish – On the move from good to great. SubJournal, 6(1), 9-16.
-
Mikesell, C. (2003) Growing the showcase garden. SubJournal, 4(2), 42-46.
-
Olson, P. R., & Jensen, J. N. (2003) Using permanent site-based substitute teachers to improve student achievement and school environment: A case analysis. SubJournal, 4(2), 66-71.
Recruiting a staff of qualified substitute teachers can become a daunting task at times. If attention toward
recruitment practices and strategies is weak, then the number and quality of the individuals required will
miss the mark. Making sure a school district has a sufficient number of available and trained substitute
teachers will ensure that schools are fully staffed. Avoid the pitfall that assumes raising pay will solve
a shortage of substitute teachers. Studies have shown that administrators see pay as the number one
incentive that draws substitutes to an area, but that substitutes view pay rates as second to both training
and recognition for their work (Sorenson, 2001). For more information on how training can be used as
an effective recruitment and retention tool, see the Training section of this SubGuide. The following
articles address recruitment concerns and issues:
-
Burke, R. M. (2000). Substitutes as graduate interns: Everyone becomes a winner. SubJournal, 1(1), 57-62.
-
Byers, K. D. (2003). SubWays: Ways to track, train, and retain quality substitute teachers. SubJournal, 4(1), 42-53.
-
Cardon, P. W. (2001). Recruiting and retaining substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(1), 37-44.
-
Cumo, C. (2002). Socrates, Jesus and Gandhi: Toward reform in substitute teaching. SubJournal, 3(1), 37-44.
-
Ferguson, A. (2001). Recruiting strategies for substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(1), 62-71.
-
Smith, G. G. (2001). A time of opportunity with increased numbers of substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(2), 21-26.
-
Sorenson, B. L. (2001). Money has not solved the problem – Personalizing policies to attain and retain substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(1), 31-36.
Screening can be a very useful process to ensure that potential employees meet state and district
requirements. Screening is a worthwhile tool and so we must ask ourselves this question - since
screening involves both man power and time, do we have the necessary resources to commit? Every
reasonable precaution should be taken to ensure that students are not placed in harmful situations or
with an unqualified person. The screening process ought to be more than submitting fingerprints and
a criminal background check. Screening provides administrators with the opportunity to assess an
applicant’s ability to function as a professional teacher in the classroom. The shortage of teachers
throughout the nation cannot be blamed for, nor accepted as a reason for, placing "unqualified substitute
teachers in classrooms" (Kakkuri, 2000). By utilizing screening, classrooms can be staffed with a
qualified professional each day of the week. The following articles are relevant to screening concerns
and issues:
Training is fundamental to a district’s ability to create a dynamic substitute teacher pool. It is
a viable tool for both recruitment and retention. Put simply, trained individuals are more willing to
substitute teach and less likely to find new employment. Districts often fail to meet the long-term needs
of their substitute teachers because substitutes are seen as temporary or fill-in teachers. Training helps to
meet these long-term needs and fulfill a substitute’s need to be seen as something more than a temporary
fix in the school or district. Further, any worthy investment in substitute teacher training benefits both
the students and the substitutes. Continual instruction focusing on the best teaching techniques creates
strong educators who enter a classroom enthusiastically and are prepared to teach under any set of
circumstances.
Requiring substitute teacher to take training is the most effective method to improve your substitute teaching
program within your district. Substitute teachers are more prepared to enter the classroom on the first day and
tend to stay longer than those who receive little or no training.
Although learning can be accidental, training seldom is. With a little investigation and
preparation, a meritorious training program can be arranged for substitute teachers; and it does not
need to be expensive or complicated. For tips and information on how training can and has helped in
recruiting and retaining substitute teachers, refer to the following articles:
-
Ballard, M. (2005). One district's experience in creating an effective substitute training program. SubJournal, 6(1), 40-47.
-
Baranowski, C. (2002). Training: A little different approach. SubJournal, 3(1), 45-53.
-
Byers, K. D. (2003). SubWays: Ways to track, train, and retain quality substitute teachers. SubJournal, 4(1), 42-53.
-
Coffey, L. A. (2003). Working together to solve management issues. SubJournal, 4(1), 54-60.
-
Edelmann, P. (2003). Substitute teachers: Not just a warm body anymore! SubJournal, 4(1), 21-32.
-
Gentry, K. M. (2005). The journey of an educational service center into the development of an effective substitute teacher training program. SubJournal, 6(1), 28-34.
-
Hardman, S., & Tippets, Z. (2001). Permanent teacher preparation for substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(1), 21-25.
-
Latham, G. (2001). Behind the schoolhouse door: Eight skills every teacher should have. SubJournal, 2(2), 64-84.
-
Latham, G. (2002). Management, not "discipline": A wake-up call for educators. SubJournal, 3(1), 69-85.
-
Longhurst, M. (2000). Enhance "one" year of education. SubJournal, 1(1), 40-47.
-
Longhurst, M. L. (2001). Handyman training for substitutes: How districts can prepare substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(1), 45-52.
-
Minthorn, R. (2000). How one district implemented a substitute teacher training program, SubJournal, Vol.1, No. 1, p.27
-
Platt, J. (2000). Preparing substitute teachers for special education settings: Ensuring the quality and continuity of teaching and learning. SubJournal, 1(2), 15-24.
-
Smith, G. G. (2002). Quick to criticize, slow to train: The irony at the heart of substitute teaching. Education Week, 21(20), 34.
-
Sorenson, B. (2005, May). No substitute for training. American School Board Journal, 46-47, 63.
-
Thompson, D. K. (2000). Substituting in the special education classroom. SubJournal, 1(2), 25-30.
Do we or don't we? Should substitutes receive a formal evaluation? No matter what your
individual position is, educators agree that feedback concerning the teaching of substitute teachers
is desired and can be valuable. Evaluation provides substitutes with the ability to give and receive
feedback regarding their teaching experiences. If substitute teachers were evaluated more often,
their performance would most likely improve because of the suggestions and feedback received from
the evaluator. When substitutes learn to evaluate their own performance, accept suggestions for
improvement, and recognize changes that must occur to improve their teaching skills, they are on the
path to becoming better teachers and valuable assets to a district. "Substitute teachers cannot become
effective if they are not aware they are ineffective" (Ramirez, 1996). For more information concerning
evaluation see the following articles:
In today's job market school districts need to continually upgrade and be proactive in
maintaining an adequate pool of substitute teachers. Districts that retain substitute teachers have
recognized substitutes as valuable to the district. They have provided substitutes with good working
environments, included them in professional development opportunities and training, and in Teacher
Appreciation Subweek.
One district indicated that the factor that had the largest impact on substitute teacher retention
was training. Training proves to be essential to retention. A myth exists that substitutes often leave
school districts because of low wages. Research conducted by the Substitute Teaching Institute at Utah
State University revealed that the number one reason substitutes are leaving is because of how they are
treated, not the dollar amount tied to their services. The second reason for substitutes' leaving "is their
inability to manage classroom behavior" (Sorenson, 2001). The following articles deal with retention:
-
Byers, K. D. (2003). SubWays: Ways to track, train, and retain quality substitute teachers. SubJournal, 4(1), 42-53.
-
Cardon, P. W. (2001). Recruiting and retaining substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(1), 37-44.
-
Gonzales, L. M. (2002). Inspiring the pinch-hitters: Job satisfaction and dissatisfaction of substitute teachers. SubJournal, 3(2), 53-64.
-
Sorenson, B. L. (2001). Money has not solved the problem – Personalizing policies to attain and retain substitute teachers. SubJournal, 2(1), 31-36.
-
Swetnam, L. A., & Lane, R. (2001). Supporting substitute success saves time. SubJournal, 2(2), 58-63.
-
Coffey, L. A. (2003). Working together to solve management issues. SubJournal, 4(1), 54-60.
The driving force behind substitute teacher demand has become teacher absenteeism. With
the advent of increased state teacher workshops related to curriculum development, district planning
responsibilities, national conference attendance, and regular absent requests, more and more teachers
are frequently out of the classroom. It has been found that when the regular classroom teacher is
excessively absent from the classroom, the achievement and performance of students suffers and the
consistency of the classroom environment is disrupted (Smith, 2001). SubManagers can combat the
effects that teacher absenteeism has on student learning. To better understand how to reduce teacher
absenteeism and its effects read:
-
Grant, F. D. (2000). Staff attendance … The forgotten key! SubJournal, 1(2), 42-47.
-
Lugo, S. (2004). No substitute for quality: A time series quasi-experimental study of the effects of a pay for performance remedy for teacher absenteeism. SubJournal, 5(2), 9
-
Pohl, J. M. (2001). Teacher absenteeism. SubJournal, 2(2), 27-31.
-
Smith, G. G. (2001). Increasing teacher attendance. SubJournal, 2(1), 8-17.